The New York Times has been mocked on social media after publishing a headline mistaking what the ‘NATO‘ acronym stands for.
Reporting on President Trump’s threats to break off from the military alliance, the outlet printed a headline on Friday reading: ‘A North American Treaty Organization Without America?’
The headline appeared to mistake the correct name for NATO, which is North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
The blunder quickly circulated social media and led to ridicule, with Politico editor Sasha Issenberg first pointing out the mistake in an X post.
‘Does the @nytimes know what NATO stands for?’ he questioned.
After posts about the mistake racked up millions of views, the New York Times said it would issue a correction in Saturday’s print edition.
‘A headline with an article on Friday about President Trump’s threats to leave NATO misstated the full name of the body,’ the outlet said.
‘It is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, not the North American Treaty Organization.’
The New York Times was mocked on social media after publishing a headline mistaking what the ‘NATO’ acronym stands for
After posts about the mistake racked up millions of views, the New York Times said it would issue a correction in Saturday’s print edition
The slip led social media users to ridicule the news outlet, as many questioned how the error slipped through the cracks at the esteemed company.
One critic on X wrote: ‘How did an editor not catch that? Amateur hour.’
‘So you finally googled NATO?’ joked another after the paper issued a correction.
The Daily Mail has contacted the New York Times for comment.
The article on the future of the military alliance was sparked by bombshell remarks Trump made this week, indicating he is strongly considering pulling the US out of NATO.
In an interview with the Telegraph, he said removing America from the 77-year-old alliance is now ‘beyond reconsideration.’
He said: ‘I was never swayed by NATO. I always knew they were a paper tiger, and Putin knows that too, by the way.’
Join the discussion
What does this blunder say about trust in major news outlets covering global conflicts?
The article on the future of the military alliance was sparked by bombshell remarks Trump made this week, indicating he is strongly considering pulling the US out of NATO
Since the start of the war with Iran, the US has unsuccessfully tried to lobby its NATO allies into joining the fight.
The defense bloc has been reluctant to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, the vital waterway that ordinarily sees 20 percent of the world’s oil pass through every day.
Following the establishment of a blockade, Iran has all but closed the Strait for weeks, sending oil and gas prices soaring.
NATO’s halting response on the Middle East appears to have irked Trump, who said: ‘Beyond not being there, it was actually hard to believe. I just think it should be automatic.
‘We’ve been there automatically, including Ukraine. Ukraine wasn’t our problem. It was a test, and we were there for them, and we would always have been there for them. [NATO] weren’t there for us.’
He also accused the UK of being weak and accused the Royal Navy of not being in a good enough shape to fight: ‘You don’t even have a navy. You’re too old and had aircraft carriers that didn’t work.’
