Kotoka International Airport
The Ghana Airports Company Limited (GACL) has categorically denied recent reports alleging critical safety lapses at Kotoka International Airport (KIA).
In a statement issued on Friday, May 23, 2025, GACL addressed claims made in a publication by The Herald newspaper, describing them as “false, baseless, and malicious.”
According to the story published on May 23, 2025, a whistleblower at the Ghana Airports Company Limited (GACL) exposed critical safety lapses at Kotoka International Airport (KIA), particularly within the Airside Operations Unit.
These issues included insufficient operational vehicles, outdated signalling equipment, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and faulty communication systems which have led to growing unrest among the Airside Operations Unit, with staff threatening to withdraw their services.
However, in a response released by the company, the issues were addressed.
Contrary to assertions that only one operational vehicle is available for airside activities, GACL clarified that the Airside Operations Section has two dedicated vehicles, supplemented by a fleet of operational vehicles to support round-the-clock operations.
Regarding equipment, the company stated that there is a surplus of marshalling wands in stock at the central stores, refuting claims that only three pairs are currently operational.
“The number of marshalling wands used depends on aircraft movement. Currently there is a surplus of marshalling wands in stock for operations at the company’s central stores,” the statement read.
Additionally, GACL emphasised that staff have been provided with the required quantity of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), including reflective vests, safety boots, ear defenders, and other necessary gear.
“This assertion is categorically false. PPEs were distributed in Accra and the regional airports as well,” he said.
Addressing communication concerns, GACL asserted that the Airside Operations Section is equipped with adequate handheld and base radios to ensure effective coordination with Air Traffic Control.
The company also clarified that access to restricted areas is managed through established protocols, with Aviation Security granting access as necessary to maintain safety and security standards.
“This is to enhance security while maintaining safety standards, therefore the allegation of airside staff unable to access certain restricted areas to carry out inspections is false,” the statement explained.
GACL dismissed reports of staff agitation within the Airside Operations Unit, attributing such claims to a few individuals with “parochial interests.”
“Staff found complicit in fabricating and spreading malicious lies about the organization to put the image of the company, the management and the government’s image into disrepute emanating from their own parochial interest will be dealt with severely.
“Media houses who accept to disseminate defamatory articles without researching the facts will also be dealt with according to the full rigors of the law,” the statement warned.
GACL urged the public to disregard the unfounded allegations and assured stakeholders of its unwavering commitment to providing safe and efficient airport services.
See some images shared by GACL below:
ID/MA
