Clover Moore’s decision to ban gas appliances in all new buildings from 2026 is yet another example of local government mistaking symbolism for substance.
It won’t meaningfully reduce emissions; it might even increase them if the energy grid needs to rely on coal-fired power to keep up with rising electricity demand.
It certainly won’t deliver the promised cost savings, and it won’t wean the city off fossil fuels either.
Gas bottles for BBQs will still be allowed, I assume? The inconsistencies are rife, especially when you consider that the NSW Premier has already ruled out a statewide rollout of Moore’s idea.
What it will do is generate virtue-signalling headlines allowing councillors to claim they’re doing something – despite solving very little. It’s just theatre.
And that’s before you even consider the consequences for development approvals, which will become even more complicated under Moore’s plan.
It could potentially restrict the number and scale of new builds that are necessary to help address the national housing crisis that serious politicians are trying to solve.
This, above, will be a scene from another time if City of Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore has her way
China is, yes, ramping up its renewable energy and nuclear power plant offerings – but has a fleet of 1,000 thermal coal-fired power plants which is still growing
Let’s start with the economics of this lunacy. The claim that households will save $626 a year is based on optimistic assumptions about future electricity prices and appliance performance.
It ignores the fact that the grid isn’t reliably equipped to handle mass electrification, especially during peak demand.
There’s also the inconvenient truth that many people prefer cooking with gas.
But personal choice and practical realities take a back seat to ideological grandstanding.
The idea that gas stoves are the new cigarettes is laughable. If gas appliances were genuinely hazardous at the scale being implied, we’d expect to see consistent health warnings from national regulators, not inner-city councils freelancing on public health.
This kind of hyperbole only damages the credibility of the broader climate change movement.
Then you have to consider the global picture. While Moore’s council congratulates itself for banning stovetops, China, as the world’s largest emitter, is building new coal-fired power stations at a record pace alongside efforts to transition to renewables.
Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore’s move allows the council to congratulate itself, but it won’t move the temperature gauge in the slightest
It is building solar farms the size of cities – but also rolling out nuclear plants and expanding coal capacity to stabilise the grid.
Why? Because that’s what it takes to decarbonise without blackouts or economic shock.
Sydney’s ban won’t meaningfully shift Australia’s own emissions trajectory, much less the world’s. Certainly not while the national grid still leans so heavily on coal.
This kind of misplaced activism diverts attention from real policy levers like grid upgrades, national emissions standards and large-scale energy storage.
The planet doesn’t need more stunts – it needs serious, scalable solutions, and Moore’s ‘idea’ isn’t one of them.
