Programmes Officer at the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Vera Abena Addo
The parliamentary vetting of government nominees has sparked discussions on improving efficiency and accountability in Ghana’s democratic processes.
Vera Abena Addo, a Programmes Officer at the Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), shared her thoughts during an interview on JoyNews’ Newsfile, emphasising the need for a more streamlined and inclusive approach.
“So far, we’ve seen good questions from Parliament, which have triggered equally good responses from the nominees,” Addo remarked.
She acknowledged the vital role parliamentary vetting plays in consolidating democracy, noting that the process enhances both vertical and horizontal accountability.
She also commended the media for providing the public with a transparent window into the proceedings.
“We spend too much time on one nominee, often because some members ask multiple questions while others remain silent, particularly from the majority. This isn’t efficient,” she noted.
In her view, introducing a hybrid approach could significantly enhance the process.
“Having a hybrid approach where experts from different fields participate could make vetting more thorough. Parliament is composed of individuals with diverse expertise, and committees are set up based on that. Perhaps we could leverage this and conduct parallel vetting sessions to save time,” she suggested.
Meanwhile, watch as Empress Gifty weeps uncontrollably as she pays last respects to her mother:
