Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has refused calls to launch a royal commission into the Bondi Beach terror attack, arguing it is the ‘national interest’ to hold a review into the security agencies instead.
During a press conference on Monday afternoon, Albanese staunchly defended his decision despite demands from the victims’ families he launch a national inquiry.
‘My heart goes out to them at what is an incredibly traumatic time. My job, as the Australian Prime Minister, is to act in the national interest,’ Albanese said.
‘It is in the national interest for us to do the Richardson review on national security, on any gaps which are there in the conduct of our agencies, including the AFP, ASIO and the interactions between the Commonwealth and state jurisdictions, and to then make sure we act on the recommendations which are there.’
He said that while royal commissions ‘can be good at deciding facts’, they are ‘not as good at considering things that are not agreed, where people have differences of views.’
The review, which will be led by Dennis Richardson – former head of ASIO and of the departments of defence and foreign affairs – will assess Australia’s federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies.
It is expected to be finalised by April.
The review was called in the aftermath of the December 14 attack in which Islamic State-inspired gunman Sajid Akram, 50, and his 24-year-old son Naveed Akram allegedly killed 15 people on Bondi Beach.
‘The government is committed to making sure that we can’t wait years for answers. We need to get on with any changes that are required,’ Albanese said.
‘This ISIS-inspired atrocity in Bondi is a stark reminder of the rapidly changing security environment that we face and the need to make sure our agencies have what they need and we’re determined to make sure they have exactly that.’
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has refused widespread calls to launch a Royal Commission into the Bondi Beach terrorist attack, despite pleas from the victims’ families
The PM, who was flanked by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, was repeatedly grilled by reporters on Monday over why a royal commission couldn’t also run parallel to the inquiry.
‘You will have the NSW royal commission, you will have the Burgess review, you will have court cases against the perpetrator of this atrocity, who survived, all running at once. And at the same time, you will have legislation proposed before the parliament,’ he said.
‘[If we had a royal commission], the full sweep of issues that have been asked to be examined would delay, by a number of years, any outcome.’
Burke agreed, adding that ‘there has never been a royal commission which has been capable of acting with the speed of this inquiry will deal with.’
‘With national security information, by definition, it doesn’t lend itself to public inquiry,’ he said.
‘But in the issue of unity versus division, if you were to make those issues subject to a royal commission, it is not simply the people who feel they have been harmed by things that have been said or slogans that have been used, that will be called.
‘It will also be those who have made those statements, who will make submissions, who will be platformed. And all of that happens again and gets relived.
‘And no one can tell me that that is in the interest of unity to re-platform some of the worst voices.’
More to come.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said a royal commission would help platform ‘some of the worst voices’
