Donald Trump has suffered another legal blow as Alina Habba, his handpicked US Attorney for New Jersey, has been disqualified by an appeals court.
A panel of judges from the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals sitting in Philadelphia voted 3-0, siding with a lower court judge’s ruling after hearing oral arguments at which Habba herself was present on October 20.
Habba, a close ally of the president who defended him during his high-profile New York civil fraud trial and the E. Jean Carroll defamation case, had been kept in place after her interim appointment expired despite lacking Senate confirmation.
District court judges moved to replace her with her deputy, but the Trump administration used legal maneuvers involving vacancies law to keep her in post as the ‘acting’ attorney.
Habba was in the midst of an investigation into New Jersey‘s Democratic governor Phil Murphy over his order for state cops to refrain from helping ICE agents.
But on Monday, judges Luis Restrepo, an Obama appointee, David Smith and David Fisher, both George W. Bush picks, ruled that Trump’s ex-personal attorney was acting unlawfully.
Habba is not the first Trump prosecutor whose appointment has been challenged.
Last week, a federal judge dismissed criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after concluding that Lindsey Halligan, the hastily installed prosecutor who filed the charges, was unlawfully appointed as interim US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Alina Habba attends her swearing-in ceremony as interim U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, March 28
The Justice Department has said it intends to appeal the rulings.
A lower court judge said in August Habba’s appointment was done with a ‘novel series of legal and personnel moves’.
That order said her actions since July could be invalidated, but he stayed the order pending appeal.
The government argued Habba is validly serving in the role under a federal statute allowing the first assistant attorney, a post she was appointed to by the Trump administration.
A similar dynamic is playing out in Nevada, where a federal judge disqualified the Trump administration’s pick to be US attorney there.
The Habba case comes after several people charged with federal crimes in New Jersey challenged the legality of Habba’s tenure.
They sought to block the charges, arguing she didn’t have the authority to prosecute their cases after her 120-day term as interim US attorney expired.
Habba briefly served as a White House adviser before Trump appointed her as a federal prosecutor in March.
Lindsey Halligan, special assistant to the president, speaks with a reporter outside of the White House, August
Shortly after her appointment, she said in an interview that she hoped to help ‘turn New Jersey red,’ a rare overt political expression from a prosecutor.
She then brought a trespassing charge, eventually dropped, against Democratic Newark Mayor Ras Baraka stemming from his visit to a federal immigration detention center.
Habba later charged Democratic US Rep. LaMonica McIver with assault stemming from the same incident, a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress other than for corruption. McIver denied the charges and pleaded not guilty. The case is pending.
Questions about whether Habba would continue in the job arose in July when her temporary appointment was ending and it became clear New Jersey’s two Democratic US senators, Cory Booker and Andy Kim, would not back her appointment.
Earlier this year, as her appointment was expiring, federal judges in New Jersey exercised their legal authority to replace Habba with a career prosecutor who had served as her deputy.
Attorney General Pam Bondi then fired the prosecutor appointed by the judges and reinstated Habba as the acting US attorney.
The Justice Department argued the judges acted prematurely and maintained that Trump had the authority to appoint his preferred candidate to enforce federal laws in the state.
Brann’s ruling said the president’s appointments are still subject to the time limits and power-sharing rules laid out in federal law.
